Openshift on Le Site de François

KubeVirt

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

KubeVirt is a CNCF project that makes Kubernetes a native hypervisor management plane, allowing KVM virtual machines to be declared, scheduled, and operated through the Kubernetes API without a separate virtualisation management layer. The motivating use case is organisational convergence: teams running a mix of legacy VM workloads and modern containerised services no longer need two separate platforms (an OpenStack or vSphere cluster for VMs, a Kubernetes cluster for containers) with separate networking, storage, RBAC, and CI/CD integration. With KubeVirt, both workload types live in the same cluster, share the same kubectl and GitOps tooling, and are subject to the same scheduling, resource quota, and network policy primitives. KubeVirt reached 1.0 in 2023 and is the engine behind Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, the downstream product used by organisations migrating away from VMware.

KVM/QEMU

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) and QEMU (Quick Emulator) solve different halves of the same problem and are almost always used together. KVM is a Linux kernel module that turns the kernel into a hypervisor: with Intel VT-x or AMD-V, guest CPUs run on real hardware at near-native speed and guest memory is managed through extended page tables. KVM has no device model of its own — no disk, network, or firmware emulation. QEMU supplies that in userspace (virtio, USB, VGA, ACPI) and controls KVM by issuing ioctl calls on /dev/kvm — creating VMs, mapping memory, running vCPUs via KVM_RUN — while QMP exposes external management over a Unix socket. libvirt, originally from Red Hat, sits above both: it translates domain XML into QEMU command lines and lifecycle operations. The stack is the default on Linux: RHEL ships qemu-kvm, OpenShift Virtualization runs KubeVirt (virt-launcher → libvirt → QEMU), and OpenShift Sandboxed Containers uses Kata Containers with the same hypervisor to isolate pods in micro-VMs.

RHCOS (Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS)

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

RHCOS (Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS) is the operating system that runs on every OpenShift control plane and worker node. It is not a general-purpose Linux distribution — it is a purpose-built, immutable, container-optimised OS designed to run exclusively as a managed node in an OpenShift cluster. Its security posture is architecturally different from a hardened RHEL installation: rather than hardening a mutable system through configuration management, RHCOS makes the OS layer structurally resistant to modification by design. The root filesystem’s /usr tree is read-only (enforced at mount time by rpm-ostree and, in recent versions, by composefs over the OSTree object store), /etc and /var are writable but managed exclusively by the Machine Config Operator (MCO), and no package manager is available at runtime for ad-hoc software installation. An operator who wants to change any node-level configuration — kernel arguments, sysctl settings, systemd units, certificates, kubelet configuration — creates a MachineConfig object in the OpenShift API; the MCO renders it into an Ignition config, applies it to the target MachineConfigPool (master, worker, or custom), and drains and reboots the affected nodes in a rolling fashion. Direct SSH access to nodes for configuration changes is explicitly unsupported and actively discouraged — oc debug node/<name> is the supported emergency access path, dropping into a privileged container on the node’s host namespaces under audit.

SCC (Security Context Constraints)

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

Security Context Constraints (SCCs) are OpenShift’s mechanism for controlling and enforcing the security posture of pods at admission time. They predate and are more expressive than Kubernetes PSA: where PSA validates a pod spec against a fixed profile and either admits or rejects it, an SCC acts as both a validator and a mutator — it can inject missing fields into the pod spec (a UID from the namespace’s allocated range, an SELinux context, capability drops) so that a pod that did not specify its full security context in its manifest is brought into compliance automatically rather than rejected. SCCs are cluster-scoped resources, and access to them is controlled via RBAC: a service account must be granted use of an SCC through a Role or ClusterRole binding before pods running under that service account can be admitted with the permissions that SCC grants.